Tip Jar

For the Blog!

Tip Jar

Learn More

iTunes Podcast Link

  • Click here to subscribe!

    Icon-Podcasting-3

Buy Prints!!!

  • Support Street Photography!

    Want to keep the "real" Korea experience with you always? Prints of any documentary/art photo I have taken on this site are 175,000 KRW ($175 USD), signed, numbered, and framed. For the print only, you need only pay 125,000 KRW ($125 USD) for the same without the frame. Please contact me directly via email for orders.

Google Analytics

BLOG LEGAL

  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF

Must Read

« October 2004 | Main | December 2004 »

November 18, 2004

"En Femme"

This is the first half of an extremely long series of thoughts, which I plan to complete a bit later. But I wanted to get this out there, since I was obsessing over this long piece and letting it sit on my hard drive for days; at that rate, it would never get finished. Here goes Part 1:

After a long time consciously watching Korean women through the viewfinder of my camera, on top of the all but unconscious "watching" I automatically do as a function of male desire - my male "gaze" - it Enfemmestruck me that many Korean women remind me of drag queens. Obviously, I am being a bit facetious, but only a little bit. This observation goes right to the heart of my thoughts about what I describe as the "fetishized femininity" that defines female identity here. I don't mean for my observations, like most of my photography - to be inherently comparative by locating everything in relation to my own life experience in the US or other countries I have visited or lived in. But since the standard Korean defense against any critique of things problematic is comparative equivocation, (the most popular form being "there are good and bad people everywhere," followed by "you have X in America, too!"), I must inevitably begin by invoking the magical protective powers of an explanative, qualifying seque.

BEGIN SEGUE
Every culture/society/country has different problems and issues, rooted in specific histories and informed by various cultural traits and tendencies. America's prosperity was predicated upon - literally built upon - land taken by force and false treaties from people who were already living on it. The quick answer to labor issues and to the too many indentured servants demanding both headrights and real rights was the importation of the cheapest labor you could find: slaves. Make this into a system that utilized race to mark the inherited and permanent status of slavery, and you get a racial apartheid the likes of which the world had never seen. Fast forward a few hundred years, and Americans still have a particular problem with and obsession over race that doesn't affect other people in the world as it does us, in our particularly American way. Koreans discriminate against people of other races and nationalities nowadays, and many viciously so, such that there is now a pattern of racialized discrimination here as well. But for an American to say "Hey - we're not the only ones with a discrimination problem - look at Koreans and Japanese - it's just natural to do it." Naw, brah. Equivocation can't work here, for obvious reasons. The histories are different; in one case the understanding of race has slowly evolved over hundreds of years of a particular history, formed by an racialized economy that created social categories themselves, ones that would be used to regulate every kind of interaction in society. I have opinions about what motivates Korean thinking about race, which my dissertation is partially about, but I won't bore you with it here. I will simply state the obvious when I say that the two cases just can't be compared. The equivocation eliminates the fact of historical, cultural, and just plain accidental specificity. That's the high-brow argument. My low-brow argument is simply that "Two wrongs don't make a right" and what the hell does one case have to do with the other, anyway? Ok - people in other countries do similar bad shit as you do in your own...so? What's the next line of reasoning here? It's a meaningless gesture of defensiveness. So I don't want to see anybody pulling that one on in responses to this piece. Your flawed reasoning has been preemptively struck.
END SEGUE

Whew! Back to Korean women. So we've talked about sex work in Korea. Yes, the oldest profession exists everywhere, any which way it can. We know that gender discrimination exists in most places, but we know that the matter of degree is quite important. The same can be said for something as abstract as the construction of female identity, especially in capitalist, industrialized economies with active consumer cultures. Add in the factors of being patriarchal societies with market-driven mass media that utilize women's bodies as conduits through which to market and sell commodities, notwithstanding the fact that a large portion of the economy deals with the buying and selling of women's bodies as commodities in themselves - and it can be easily argued that there is enough of a common framework of comparison within which to identify and talk about the crucial differences. We wouldn't be talking about the moral question of the high degree of sex work in Korea if this country were still undeveloped, or vastly different from many other industrialized, capitalist democracies. But the case is that Korea is materially and socially like Norway, America, Germany, Japan, Brazil, South Africa, Australia, etc. The degree of "development" isn't the same, but the mode of existence is.

At least when Koreans generally favorably compare their country to others, this is the framework they're using; the boast that Korea has the most developed IT infrastructure in the world doesn't get supported with comparisons to war-torn Eritrea or the former Sovet-bloc Republic of Georgia. The comparison happens between such powerful nations as Japan, Germany, and the United States. This is the framework within which differences between how women are socialized becomes meaningful; but again, the point here isn't to equivocate, but to establish the undeniable commonality that enables us to label the degree of sex work in a given country as relatively embarrassing. So if we assume that meaningful differences exist between essentially similar societies, and that certain aspects of such societies can be called - whether in terms of scale or degree - better or worse than others, it follows that we can make assertions about things such as the relative degree of gender discrimination, treatment of ethnic or religious minorities, the quality of public health care, or equal access to decent public eduction, we should also be able to see peculiarities in terms of how people are socialized, and what relationship this might have to the kind of factors that were just mentioned.

And if we look at the way women in general carry themselves here - or the way female identity itself is constructed - there are myriad ways to notice a particularly Korean aspects of the gendered mode of appearance, behavior, speech, and overall comportment. When you look at the social realities surrounding women in Where_are_youKorea - a country sporting one of the highest rates of sex work in the industrialized world, where there are more sex workers than school teachers, where women in skimpy attire promote everything from cars to toothbrushes, and for which the Gender Empowerment Measure therefore puts Korea near the bottom of the scale of 70 measured developed and undeveloped countries alike, right next to countries in which polygamy, "honor killings," and domestic violence is de facto, if not de jure legal - surely this must affect the expectations men have for women, how women see themselves in terms of these expectations, and the creation of general codes of interaction between the two genders.

Surely the expectations placed upon men, the acceptance of aggressive behavior with a "boys will be boys" attitude, solidified with the two years and two months spent in the hazing society of compulsory military service, reinforced in the workplace by a rigid, miliatarized heirarchy, bolstered by the constant and open access to women's bodies as objects of visual and sexual consumption - must have some affect on the way men see themselves as men.

Let me defer to authority and quote the scholar John Berger, from his text Ways of Seeing:

"Men look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at. This determines not only most relations between men and women but also the relation of women to themselves."

So I am arguing that the very character of feminity is different here. It's not so much different in form as it is simply a matter of sheer effort. Korean men often boastingly ask me "Aren't Korean women more beautiful than American women?" I usually begin my reply with a "They sure are!" but before I let them enjoy that assuring feeling of having once again established another aspect of Korean culture that is superior to America's, I continue with, "but who wouldn't be, if American women were so weight-Cute_modeobsessed that they were actually successful in starving themselves into a constant state of being much thinner than their genes dictate, makeup and 3-inch heels were nearly requirements for stepping outside of the house, not to mention the perms, plastic surgery, short skirts, and fashion trends that only barely don't fall into the realm of fetish wear in the States (e.g. the winter season's knee socks w/ heels and pleated schoolgirl skirts)." OK - my reply is usually a shorter version of that. But indeed, if most college-age American girls dressed like Britney Spears-lite, working women were required to wear schoolgirl-like uniforms with skirtlines well above the knee, and plastic surgery were so ubiquitous that it was offered as the first prize in fast food chain contests for high school girls (thank Lotteria for that brilliant idea) - I would have to describe American women as sizzling. Booyah! Back dat thang up! Baby got back!

And it's not that only foreign men notice this and find it a little strange - most Western women I have talked to do as well. In fact, I would think that women would notice even more than men would. An American friend of mine put it succinctly when she said "I never felt like such a tomboy before coming to Korea." On the level of femininity that defines the norm of gendered life here, most Western women I know have given up trying to compete. Just looking at the face-centric emphasis on "cute" - before even getting to the nearly requisite eye and nose jobs, the black contact lenses that make the irises look bigger, the straight "magic perm" and color, the all-too frequent use of false eyelashes - the daily commitment of applying makeup alone requires getting up from 15 minutes to an hour early, depending on your particular level of fastidiousness. Add on the fact most Western women can't even buy brassieres, shoes, or depending on who you are - any clothes at all - in Korea, a lot of women end up feeling like the Sasquatch, hurrying to lumber away from the eyes of the frightened city-dwelling humans who want to capture you for scientific study.

To be continued...

November 02, 2004

About my stoopid picture...

For those of you wondering about the painful cheeriness of my picture, please don't think me a complete freak. It started as a joke, with me parodying the women taking self-portraits with their cellphone cameras on subways, waiting for the bus - well, just about everywhere. This particular picture was the result of a slaphappy, but inspired moment when was able to successfully (or so I think) reproduce the affected cuteness of the "eoljjang" face pictures for which Korean women have come to be known as specialists. As both photographer and subject - a conceptual overlap that is quite rare, for habitual objectifiers tend to dislike objectfication - I realized that this was actually a specific and learnable skill. With the proper angle and lens length, almost anyone can make their mug look like the "best face" on the block. It just took my peeking out past my usual ascerbic cynicism about mass consumer culture for a moment; as an old friend of mine always puts it, I just needed to "get over myself."

Actually, I am loathe to admit, it was quite fun, and I mug for many a friend's cellphone now. I have gotten quite a bit better at the euljjang shot. I wouldn't say that my face is particularly cute, nor does my body match the lie I can perpetrate with a cellphone camera. By way of defending my dignity, must say that I don't do it with the intent of pursuing the pure aesthetic that defines true eoljjang photography: making myself appear handsome, or fooling others into thinking I am. But there is fun in the endeavor, in attempting to make the most stoopid faces and expressions possible, to try to make Webhard_000004
my face look absolutely unrecognizable, or even to use the insane roundness of my mug to make like a strange animation character. You'd really be surprised at how alien you can make yourself appear with the distortion of a high angle and a ridiculous expression. I realized that there is technique involved with taking this kind of picture - I watched in awe as an otherwise quite unextraordinary-in-appearance female friend of mine contorted her face into the most unnatural of expressions as she quite skillfully twisted and contorted her camera-wielding arm and herself into just the right position to take the shot - just one snap would often require a full minute or more to pose. When I got the "proofs" back in the form of the image on the cellphone screen, I was surprised to see a complete and beautiful stranger beckoning back at me. My quite unspectacular friend shot me a smug smirk as I looked back at her in complete surprise at this digital fib floating in my cellphone screen. "Save it," she ordered, beaming proudly. Wow, I said to myself - and communicated to her - I was impressed. She really knew what she was doing.

Korean women have figured something out here - the pursuit of euoljjang as veritable pop art, an evolution in knowing kitschiness that started with Japanese-style "sticker pictures," inflamed by the collective corporate decision to place cameras on cellphones, but really pushed to the level of pandemic portfolio proportions with the convergence of the "dica" (di-gital ca-mera) craze and the all-pervasive Cyworld personal homepage obsession. In combination with the fact that Korea has the highest level of broadband protection in the world, making possible many venues for proudly circulating prime moments of mugging for the camera, the high level of eoljjang evolution is...inevitable. And it has infected me too, but just a bit. I can quit anytime I want. Really.

"Why Be Critical?"

  • Before you say this site is "anti-Korean" or bashing Korea – read this: "Why Be Critical?" Chances are, if you're simply angry because I am a social critic in Korea but not actually Korean, see if your argument isn't just a kneejerk response that follows these patterns.

Photo Classes!

  • Session 1: Just the Basics Dealing with the basic operations and functions of your DSLR, explaining each function, button, and doo-hickey. The bulk of the session is likely going to stick around the relationship between aperture and shutter, as well as depth-of-field. Basically everything on your camera has something to do with this relationship.

    Session 2: Composition and Shooting (Shooting Session 1) We'll take those examples and look at them on the big screen, while also answering the concrete questions that will pop up about the stuff we learned before. Then we'll talk about composition and other framing issues, including lens lengths and why some lenses are worth $100 bucks and some are worth $10,000.

    Session 3: Flashes and Advanced Exposure (Shooting Session 2) Dealing with flash, in terms of compensating above and below exposure levels (bracketing), as well as other bracketing techniques in general.

    Session 4: Final Session/Critiques Keeping it open, determined by the class.

    Four 3-hour sessions, as well as shooting sessions, photo discussions, and critiques. An individual photo essay will also be done as part of the ongoing class assignments. Inquire at the email address at the top right of this page.

Starter Posts

Google Ads

  • Ads

Google Referrals