Dude, O.J. was guilty as sin, and still is. But he's not even trying to prove the innocence that he was granted in his criminal trial, but symbolically negated in the civil suits.
Picture from The New York Times.
His recent attempt to make money off the killing with a hypothetical confession is more than sickening. I can barely find the words.
The New York Times got their hands on a bit of the interview, while Vanity Fair got their hands on an actual copy of the book. My question is: even (and especially) if he didn't do it, how could you make money off of such a spectacle?
If I had been even accused of murdering my ex-wife, I'd spend the rest of my life trying to prove that I was innocent, not flirting with guilt and the safety net of the double-jeopardy clause.
