For whatever that's worth from this English-language blogger, I'm glad this is happening. From The New York Times:
South Korea has been shaken as one prominent person after another has been exposed as having exaggerated, or fabricated, academic accomplishments.
The exposés have prompted prosecutors, the police, the Education Ministry and regional education authorities to announce plans to combat academic record fraud. Legislators have introduced a bill calling for a verification system.
“Before, we struggled more with fake luxury goods,” said Moon Moo-il, a public prosecutor who is leading a nationwide crackdown on document forgery and misrepresentation at the prosecutor general’s office. “Now that we have entered the knowledge-based society, we have to deal with an overflow of fake knowledge.”
Finally! Now that this scandal has broken wide open, I can say what only got me in trouble for speculating about, something anyone with a sense of professionalism and in possession of a work ethic in Korea has known about for a long time: there's a lot of frauds in places of authority, but including people who aren't "fake" but fatally crippled by some combination of being completely fucking incompetent, arrogant to the point of dysfunction, and who, more likely than not, is more concerned about surface appearance than performance and efficiency.
We all know this shit, like a bad smell in the air – but we couldn't quite prove it, or even point to it in a concrete way. I knew something was up when that venerable old Spy Magazine published a list, back in 1989 or 1990, of the world's top ten buyers of fake degrees. Guess which country was #1? If you don't know, you haven't been paying atTENshun...
In my experience, especially in certain elite foreign language high schools that I cannot name but successively quit, there are nearly as many fakers as there are people who actually contribute to making their school, organization, and their country a better place.
In my time at these places, I've always found that the more prestigious the position, the more suspicious I am. It's not just fake degrees, but the complete lack of talent, most specifically the very talent that is implied by the degrees they flaunt. To wit, here are the very typical things I have observed, and always wonder, if these people are truly the "best" people in their fields, whether I should be afraid because it bodes poorly for all their colleagues, or whether many, truly more talented people get edged out. I tend to think it's the latter, but here's what I've seen:
--- "Clearing" of contract teachers who are well-liked and well-rated in the classroom for teachers with "better" degrees, e.g. my physics teacher friend who was fired from her job with an Ewha degree for a chabeol company man with a degree from Seoul National, albeit with no teaching experience. My students still complain about the fact that he has absolutely no ability to convey understanding of the material, but the school gets to put down that it has an SNU person teaching physics. Kudos!
--- Head English teachers from prestigious Korean schools who – wait for it – apparently can't speak English! I worked with one head English teacher for more than a year, and she never spoke English with any of the foreign teachers. Stellar!
--- Experienced professors in their fields – at certain prominent universities I've been at – who are still teaching theories that were discredited when Cro-Magnon man was busy discovering fire, or are just plain stoopid. OK – it's not that bad, but close. How about picking up a journal in one's field once a decade, instead of resting on one's academic laurels for the rest of one's natural life?
--- People being excused egregious mistakes because of their degree or status. A person from SNU may be as blessed as manna from heaven, but if said someone from SNU does something stupid, it's no less fucking stupid than some guy who went to Kangwon National University or a correspondence school. HEL-lo?!
--- People getting jobs because of their status. I include myself in this. I've proved through my performance, both to myself and others, that I'm a pretty damn good US History teacher, but that's not why I continue finding good jobs after I quit one school after another in a huff and tell it to go fuck itself – it's my degrees that let me do that. "Andover, Brown, Berkeley, Fulbright." It's like a magical mantra, a magical ring of power, in Korean society. Seriously – it's irritating, since I get respect not so much for what I do, but what degrees I can put on the table. God knows what I could be teaching these students – no one checks my curriculum, sits in on my classes, nor even goes through the textbooks I choose – they just say, "Oh, he went to X school." And for as hard as I try to do a good job, I know I actually don't have to. What kind of effect do you think that has on performance? A lovely one! I can pull out the Ring of Academic Power, put my ass on cruise control, and teach from a Kaplan test prep book to teach my class without busting my ass, and keep getting pizzaid! Brown! Berkeley! Don't question my AUTHORITAY!
No wonder people are lying, cheating, and stabbing each other in the back over academic degrees in Korea – because brand names are all people really care about still, when it comes right down to it. Sure, there are few exceptions, but they're tiny and related to certain specific skills or genes – things that even degrees can't buy.
And if just a little shaking of the societal tree is rousting up so MUCH plagiarism, degree faking, and other kinds of just plain lying through one's teeth – how much more do you think there REALLY is, beyond the superficial extent to which the media is focusing on a few famous stars and other prominent figures.
My read of things, from having worked in these "prestigious" high schools, universities, and organizations, is a whole FUCKING lot.
One thing I really wonder – are Korean doctoral degrees from foreign universities digitally stored now? Because I know for a fact that there are peeps who go over to chill and get master's and doctoral degrees in American grad schools, and pay someone else to write it; but that's so NOW. Back in the day, they would have probably just copied it wholesale. Easy access to the dissertations of prominent government and academic figures – the ones filed back in the 60's through to the 90's – now THAT would be a blogging project worth picking up. I'm talking whole sections and chapters copied wholesale, not problematic citations. Man – people thinking plagiarism is bad now? Try 1975. I wonder how many cabinet ministers and professors could even remember the English titles of the dissertations they filed.
Too bad we can't make a "verification system" for all the incompetent and seriously stoopid people who studied hard back in 1975 to get into a "good" school but haven't cracked a book, attended a conference (intellectually, as well as physically), or really opened their minds since.
That's harder than finding the outright fakers. Because there's a lot more fakers who actually did receive their degrees from where they said they did, but are doing worse jobs than the lying snakes who didn't.
The media should stick that in its craw and take a toke. But that'd be hitting a bit too close to home, because we all know who that guy in our office or organization is.
Recent Comments